The Production Generative AI Stack: Architecture and Components

We’re so glad you’re here. You can expect all the best TNS content to arrive Monday through Friday to keep you on top of the news and at the top of your game. Check your inbox for a confirmation email where you can adjust your preferences and even join additional groups. Follow TNS on your favorite social media networks. Become a TNS follower on LinkedIn. Check out the latest featured and trending stories while you wait for your first TNS newsletter. The enterprise AI landscape has evolved from experimental prototypes to production-grade systems, driving the emergence of a sophisticated, multilayered technology stack.Understanding each layer and its constituent components is essential for architects building scalable AI systems. Hyperscalers — including Amazon, Microsoft and Google — are leading this category by delivering an end-to-end stack that spans accelerated compute to user experiences.This architecture represents the convergence of infrastructure, intelligent orchestration and developer-centric tooling that powers modern generative AI applications.The foundation of any AI stack begins with specialized hardware optimized for the computational demands of evolving AI workloads. Modern AI workloads require processing capabilities far beyond traditional CPU architectures.Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) provide the parallel processing power essential for AI workloads. Unlike CPUs designed for sequential operations, GPUs contain thousands of cores optimized for matrix multiplications, the fundamental operation in neural network computations. GPU clusters deliver the raw throughput needed for both training large models and serving inference requests at scale. Modern deployments leverage multi-GPU configurations with high-bandwidth interconnects to handle increasingly large model architectures.Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) represent purpose-built silicon designed exclusively for AI computations. These chips optimize specific operations like matrix multiplication or attention mechanisms, often achieving better performance per watt than general-purpose GPUs. ASICs trade flexibility for efficiency, providing cost-effective inference for production workloads where the model architecture remains stable. The tight coupling between hardware and software enables optimizations that are impossible with general-purpose processors. Google Cloud TPUs, AWS Trainium,  Inferentia and Azure Maia chips are examples of ASICs.The model catalog provides organized access to diverse AI models, abstracting the complexity of model selection and deployment. This layer enables experimentation and gradual progression from general-purpose models to specialized solutions.These are proprietary models developed by the primary platform provider. First-party offerings typically include flagship large language models (LLMs) with broad capabilities, multimodal systems handling text and images, and specialized models for tasks like embedding generation or classification. Platform providers maintain these models with regular updates, safety improvements and performance optimizations. Google Gemini, Azure OpenAI and Amazon Nova are examples of these model categories.Partner models extend the ecosystem through collaborations with specialized AI research organizations and vendors. These partnerships bring state-of-the-art research models into production environments, offering alternatives with different capability profiles, licensing terms, or performance characteristics. Partner integrations enable access to models that might be impractical to host independently.Open-weight models provide transparency by making model architectures and weights publicly available. This accessibility enables detailed inspection, modification and customization. Development teams can fine-tune these models on proprietary data, experiment with architectural changes, or deploy them in air-gapped environments where external API calls are prohibited. The open nature fosters community-driven improvements and reproducible research. Almost all hyperscalers have tight integration with the Hugging Face Hub, which serves as the de facto repository for open-weight models.Vertical industries require a specialized understanding that general-purpose models may lack. Domain-specific models are pre-trained or fine-tuned on industry-relevant corpora, incorporating terminology, regulations and patterns specific to healthcare, legal, financial services, or manufacturing sectors. These models reduce the fine-tuning burden for organizations operating in these verticals. Google’s MedLM and Gemini Robotics are examples of this category.Fine-tuned models represent customized versions adapted to organizational data, writing styles, or specific task requirements. Through supervised fine-tuning or reinforcement learning from human feedback, base models learn company-specific knowledge, preferred response formats, or specialized reasoning patterns. Fine-tuning bridges the gap between general capabilities and production requirements. Cloud providers offer fine-tuning through an API that simplifies the process.Model invocation represents the execution layer where applications interact with AI models. This layer manages the complexities of running inference at scale while optimizing for cost, latency and reliability.The inference engine handles model execution, managing GPU memory allocation, batch processing and response generation. Modern inference systems employ optimizations like quantization to reduce memory footprint, speculative decoding to accelerate token generation, and continuous batching to maximize GPU utilization. Inference serving handles both real-time requests requiring low latency and batch processing, optimizing for throughput and cost.Model routing distributes requests intelligently across heterogeneous deployments, rather than hard-coding endpoints. These routing layers direct requests based on cost constraints, latency requirements, model capabilities, or load-balancing needs. This abstraction enables A/B testing between model versions, gradual rollouts, and intelligent fallback when primary models are unavailable. Custom model routers and third-party AI gateways can also split traffic across providers to avoid vendor lock-in.Prompt caching addresses redundant processing of repeated context in conversations or batch operations. By storing computed representations of common prompt prefixes, systems dramatically reduce inference costs and latency for applications with stable context structures. This optimization proves particularly valuable for agents maintaining consistent system instructions across interactions or applications processing similar documents repeatedly.Prompt management provides version control and governance for model instructions. Rather than embedding prompts in application code, centralized management enables non-technical stakeholders to iterate on prompt design, implement approval workflows, and track effectiveness through A/B testing. This separation of concerns accelerates iteration cycles and reduces deployment friction when refining model behavior.Context management solves the fundamental challenge of grounding AI responses in relevant, accurate information beyond a model’s training data. This layer implements retrieval-augmented generation patterns at scale.Embedding models transform documents, code, or other content into high-dimensional vector representations capturing semantic meaning. These dense vectors enable similarity-based retrieval where conceptually related content can be identified, even without exact keyword matches. Embedding models are typically smaller and faster than generation models, making them practical for processing large content repositories.Vector databases provide specialized storage and indexing for embeddings, supporting approximate nearest neighbor search at scale. Unlike traditional databases optimized for exact matches, vector stores excel at finding the most semantically relevant content for a given query. Advanced implementations offer hybrid search combining vector similarity with metadata filters, support for multi-tenancy, and real-time updates without requiring full reindexing.Knowledge bases aggregate organizational content, providing the source material for embedding and retrieval. This includes technical documentation, product information, customer interaction history, policy documents, or code repositories. Effective knowledge bases maintain content freshness, apply access controls, and implement chunking strategies that balance context completeness with retrieval precision.The RAG pipeline orchestrates end-to-end retrieval processes. When applications receive queries, the pipeline generates embeddings, searches vector databases for relevant chunks, and augments prompts with retrieved context before model invocation. Advanced pipelines implement multistep retrieval, where initial results inform follow-up searches, or hypothetical document embedding, where the model generates synthetic documents to improve retrieval quality.Ingestion systems handle continuous synchronization of content from source systems into knowledge bases. Connectors interface with diverse data sources, whether document repositories, databases, or APIs. These systems apply chunking strategies, extract metadata, handle incremental updates, and manage deletions. Robust ingestion pipelines ensure knowledge bases remain current without manual intervention.Search capabilities extend beyond vector similarity to hybrid approaches combining semantic and keyword-based retrieval. Re-ranking algorithms refine initial results using more sophisticated scoring. Search implementations respect access controls, filter by metadata constraints, and support faceted navigation. Advanced systems employ query understanding to reformulate or